Anna itibaren Digwar, Jharkhand 825109, Hindistan
This is a story about a family, of a mother and three daughters, as well as their extended family of cousins, step brothers and sisters-in-law and their current love interests. There is selfishness and greed; there are parties and laughter; there is music and books and love; there is heartbreak and deceit. It seems a formula for success. The eldest daughter, Elinor, is the only rational one. Her next sister, Marianne, is a silly, selfish flighty girl who cares nothing of anyone else’s problems and wants everyone to focus on her own. The third sister barely gets mentioned, as she is not old enough to fall madly in love with the wrong guy and then make a scene about it when he doesn’t love her back. The brother and sister-in-law are greedy and care only about money, even though they have plenty and don’t share it with the rest of the family. The cousins are only focused on parties and gaiety and fun. My impression of this book was that they spend the whole time having parties and looking for a husband. They fall in love with men who are unfaithful and they act quite silly about it upon realizing the man doesn‘t love them. The men are all fickle and quite rude about it, pretty much ignoring the girls once they have had enough of them and never communicating with anyone. I almost didn’t like them until I recollected that this book was written roughly 200 years ago and times WERE different then. However, I find it hard to relate and also to distance these girls from our modern times. If they were here right now, they would be completely out of place. I would tell them to shut up or to stand up for themselves for God’s sakes! This is an era where men and women still marry for money and class. An era where your mother can arrange your marriage to a “suitable” beau. An era where the women didn’t work and then men were landlords as an occupation. It is an era that I do like to read about and would like to understand, but that I have a hard time relating to. Maybe it’s Austen’s style of writing. Maybe it’s just the era. However, for such an old book, it is sometimes amazing how much things really haven’t changed. I think this quote still holds true today. “Shyness is only the effect of a sense of inferiority in some way or other. If I could persuade myself that my manners were perfectly easy and graceful, I should not be shy”. This one just cracks me up. “Elinor agreed to it all, for she did not think he deserved the compliment of rational opposition”. So she didn’t argue with him. She was snubbing him by not giving him the satisfaction of an argument. I love it. What an insult! But the best quote is this one at the end, which redeems Marianne. She finally turns around and realizes that she is not the only person in the world and the learns to respect and care about other people. She realizes that the man she loved when young was worthless and the one who has stood by and loved her for years is priceless. “Marianne Dashwood was born to an extraordinary fate. She was born to discover the falsehood of her own opinions, and to counteract, by her conduct, her most favourite maxims. She was born to overcome an affection formed so late in life as at seventeen, and with no sentiment superior to strong esteem and lively friendship, voluntarily to give her hand to another!” I cannot say I really liked this book as much as I thought I would. From hearing what other people have said, I thought it would be absolutely great. It was just okay. I have found that there are several classics that I feel about this way. Maybe the hype is just too much. My expectations are too high. Or maybe I am just not into this style of book. I will keep trying however. I give it a 3 out of 5. I liked this book but I did not love it.
"Die Zeiten des Umbruchs gehen auch an Komponisten nicht spurlos vorbei. So trifft es Gustav von Holst bei seinem Aufenthalt in einer englischen Landgemeinde, die Polizei möchte ihn sprechen, das Vergehen, ein deutscher Name zu Beginn des ersten Weltkriegs, Haydn machen seine Bilder englischer Seeschlachten unter Nelson zu schaffen, napoleonische Soldaten besetzen sein Haus, Schostakowitsch plagen Alpträume, dem fünffachen Träger des Stalinpreises ist der „Große Führer“ abhanden gekommen, eine neue Zeit bahnt sich an, und zum Schluß muß sich im restaurierten Kaiserreich Österreich Schubert für seine Nähe zur Tiroler Freiheitsbewegung verantworten. So hätte es sein können, die Umstände waren entsprechend. Für Geschichtsinteressierte ein gelungenes Spiel mit den Fakten, warum sollte es sich nicht so zugetragen haben? Jedenfalls geben die Geschichten einen Einblick in die jeweilige Zeit, denn diese wird gewöhnlich nicht so punktuell abgehandelt. Musikinteressierte werden sicherlich in den Werken die jeweiligen Veränderungen aufspüren können, mir fehlt hierzu allerdings das notwendige Wissen, deshalb bleibt dieser Bereich unberücksichtigt. Alles in allem, ein kurzer Einstieg in ein größeres Thema."